SEC Nails IBM for $10 Million in Alleged Foreign Bribery Scandal PDF Print E-mail
CIO News - Trends
Written by Chris Smith   
Monday, 21 March 2011 16:04

Company doesn't fight allegations of cash payments, gifts, and travel perks to South Korean and Chinese government officials by managers of the firm's foreign subsidiaries. 

IBM will pay $10 million in fines to settle a suit filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission alleging its overseas subsidiaries bribed South Korean and Chinese government officials with cash, goods, and improper travel, and entertainment benefits in exchange for ordering its computers and technology products. 

The company neither admitted nor denied the alleged wrongdoing detailed by the SEC in an 11-page complaint filed March 18 in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. The SEC said that IBM had failed to maintain adequate internal control systems to detect and prevent the payments and recorded the payments improperly in violation of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). 

As a result, IBM agreed to pay the SEC $5.3 million in ill-gotten profits incurred from the sales dating back to 1998, $2.7 million in interest, and $2 million in civil penalties. The settlement was announced by the SEC on the same day that it filed its court complaint leading to the assumption that IBM and the government had been in quiet discussions about the investigation and alleged wrongdoing for some time. 

During the 1998–2009 period when the alleged violations occurred, IBM had corporate policies in place prohibiting bribery. It had other written procedures relating to compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the government acknowledged. However, a lack of internal controls allowed employees in several IBM subsidiaries and a joint venture to use local business partners and travel agencies as conduits for bribes and other improper payments to South Korean and Chinese government officials, the complaint said. A failure to maintain adequate internal control systems apparently by itself is a violation of the Act. 

The violations involved IBM-Korea, a South Korean corporation that sells IBM products in South Korea, which is wholly owned indirectly by IBM International Group B.V.—in turn wholly owned by IBM; LG-IBM, a South Korean joint venture between IBM-Korea and LG Electronics, Inc., and IBM-China, used for direct sales to IBM customers in China, and which is owned by IBM China/Hong Kong, Ltd, a Hong Kong-based company that is ultimately owned by IBM, according to the SEC. 

According to the complaint, managers at the subsidiaries devised various schemes to pay cash bribes, confer gifts of cameras and laptops, and arrange for unauthorized side trips and entertainment during travel associated with attending training seminars. Some 100 employees of IBM subsidiaries were involved in the alleged violations, according to the SEC. 

In some cases, IT officials were given shopping bags filled with cash at drop-off points near their work or home, in other instances, government employees were given free notebook computers to entice them to buy IBM products. Along the way, there were alleged instances of the IBM subsidiary managers submitting phony low bids, which were later replaced with higher ones, and ignoring or covering up benchmark tests on problematic PC equipment, where the reviewing official was later rewarded for looking the other way. There was billing for software services that were never provided, and paying for inside confidential information regarding product specifications contained within a request for procurement. 

Hiding the cash used to buy perks and travel benefits also got creative with one of the LG-IBM managers depositing a refund from a business partner into his personal bank account, then  drawing upon the money to fund gifts and entertainment of government officials. The "hostess in a drink shop" was the beneficiary of some of these funds, according to the SEC, when the LG-IBM manager made a deposit directly into her bank account, presumably for her extraordinary service while entertaining South Korean government officials. The purpose of all this, the SEC alleges, was to persuade South Korean government employees to purchase IBM products. 

IBM-China managers also liked slush funds, only they created them at local travel agencies in China, and the money was used to pay for overseas and other travel expenses by Chinese government officials. Between 2004 and 2009, there were at least 114 instances in which IBM-China employees and their local travel agency worked together to create fake invoices that didn't reflect the sightseeing and itinerary deviations for the Chinese government officials attending training. Preferred travel agents soon became "authorized training providers," and fraudulent purchase requests for training services were submitted, but the money went to pay for unauthorized trips of government officials. 

Company managers also created other slush funds at their business partners and used them to make cash payments and pay for expensive technology gifts for their government customers, according to the SEC. 

In addition to the fines, IBM consented to a final judgment that permanently enjoins the company from violation of the books and records and internal control provisions of the FCPA and Securities Exchange Act.

 

 


Chris Smith
About the Author:

Chris Smith is the Senior News Editor at MC Press Online and is responsible for the news content on the company's Web site. Chris has been writing about the IBM midrange industry since 1992 when he signed on with Duke Communications as West Coast Editor of News 3X/400. With a bachelor's from the University of California at Berkeley, where he majored in English and minored in Journalism, and a master's in Journalism from the University of Colorado, Boulder, Chris later studied computer programming and AS/400 operations at Long Beach City College. An award-winning writer with two Maggie Awards, four business books, and a collection of poetry to his credit, Chris began his newspaper career as a reporter in northern California, later worked as night city editor for the Rocky Mountain News in Denver, and went on to edit a national cable television trade magazine. He was Communications Manager for McDonnell Douglas Corp. in Long Beach, Calif., before it merged with Boeing, and oversaw implementation of the company's first IBM desktop publishing system there. An editor for MC Press Online since 2007, Chris has authored some 300 articles on a broad range of topics surrounding the IBM midrange platform that have appeared in the company's eight industry-leading newsletters. He can be reached at csmith@mcpressonline.com.

Read More >>
Last Updated on Monday, 21 March 2011 16:20
 
D.Abramowitz
This is an important article that should really receive more attention. Dave
efnkay
Yeah...Why doesn\'t this revelation surprise me? IBM is just playing by the rules they all use with China and Korea and generally how it\'s done everywhere outside, and within the U.S. It\'s no different than the Vatican paying off Attila the Hun to stay out of Rome. A little bribe here, a little bribe there. Business execs meeting IBM\'s expansion goals by playing to the moral corruption of the individual. How do you get more products sold in China...Find the right guy to pay off. And I\'m sure that\'s as easy as asking, "Who do I bribe?" We can\'t see the corruption because it\'s so deep in the dirt. I don\'t believe anyone actually went to jail for the whole mortgage-backed securities thing. Nobody from AIG, the SEC itself, Meryll Lynch, BOA, you name it...nobody got punished for bringing our economy to its knees, and most companies that failed or should be out of business were bailed out. Anybody out there get paid back for the huge losses taken in your personal investments, all due directly or in part to the mortgage-backed securities boon-doggle...??? At least we got a "Hey, didn\'t see it coming." from Alan Greenspan. Our greatest financial minds didn\'t see it coming? Yeah right. Anybody want to invest your dough with me? I\'m a financial advisor now...Yeah that\'s the ticket. How many Bernie Madoffs you think are still in business? (Only one made headlines.) Better look for independent confirmation on your investments. Would you trust anyone now with a roll of dough...and say "Invest this for me now...ok?"
Please login to make comments.
User Rating: / 1
PoorBest 
   MC-STORE.COM