Whats wrong with the Navigator?

[batthish@ca.ibm.com]

Hi Patrick, Would you please e-mail me (batthish@ca.ibm.com) some source so I can easily reproduce the problem? I don't believe the problem is you :-) -- I have heard some rumblings about free-form RPG lately from others. Due to holidays, the developers I will need to talk to aren't in the office for a few weeks. Hopefully we'll get it sorted out as soon as possible and in a future service pack. Thanks, Violaine Batthish CODE Project Lead Toronto Lab, IBM Canada

[Guest.Visitor]

Thought I was aware of Navigators limitations and like the features it offers. Now coding in free format and it's support seems woeful. Sorry, don't like to criticise unecessarily but the subroutines appear in boxes with no names and some subprocdural fuctions are shown with names, others are not and the links between them do not match the calls in the program. The Topology is not showing correctly either. Maybe it's me and the criticism is unfounded. Any suggestions from anyone? Thanks Patrick

[Guest.Visitor]

Hi Violaine, Thanks...email has gone. Patrick

[Guest.Visitor]

Patrick, It's not just you and it's not just RPG free form. I have the same problem with the no-free form RPG. It looks to me that the this problem appears only if you have subprocedures defined in your programs. Goran patrick newell wrote: >Thought I was aware of Navigators limitations and like the features it offers. > >Now coding in free format and it's support seems woeful. Sorry, don't like to criticise unecessarily but the subroutines appear in boxes with no names and some subprocdural fuctions are shown with names, others are not and the links between them do not match the calls in the program. The Topology is not showing correctly either. > >Maybe it's me and the criticism is unfounded. > >Any suggestions from anyone? > >Thanks Patrick >