View Full Version : V4R3 Problems
01-01-1995, 02:00 AM
If I'm understanding what you said, the actual names of the from-file and to-file are the same. Thus the OVRDBF to QTEMP would be in effect for both the from- and to-file, and the system is doing exactly what you're telling it to do. That being the case, perhaps you could code something like this: OVRDBF FILE(goofy) TOFILE(&LIB/&FILE) - not the QTEMP file, but the to-file. CPYF FROMFILE(QTEMP/TheFromFile) TOFILE(goofy) HTH, Michael
12-16-1998, 08:20 AM
On Monday, December 14, 1998, 11:06 AM, Andrew Blankenship wrote: We just converted to V4R3 from V3R7 this weekend. An ILE program (in QILE activation group) that has been in production since April had an error on the copy statement: CPF2874 Both to-file and from-file members are the same. The from-file was qualified with library QTEMP; the to-file was qualified with a variable containing the production library. Earlier in the CLLE procedure, there is an override to QTEMP for this particular file. Has there been a change in OVRDBF or CPYF in this release? I've been searching all morning for "What's new" information for this release but haven't found anything on this situation. Also, if anyone know where I can get a compact summary of "What's new" info for ILE (CL, RPGIV, DDS, etc.), I'd appreciate the input. Thanks... Andrew, I recall a change was made to overrides between V3R7 and V4R1. I cannot verify this because I threw out the installation notes and IBM's web site is not responding. For some information on the new release you might check <a > href="http://www.as400.ibm.com/developer/education/courses.html">IBM's education website</a>. There is a good DB2/400 enhancement summary. David Morris
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.5 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.