I'm experiencing a problem using CONCAT and SST keywords in V5R2. They are not being used on the same field, which I know is not allowed. There seems to be a glitch in the DDS compiler if a field with the SST keyword immediately follows a field with the CONCAT keyword. <p>The DDS source in figure 1 results in CPF3226 on field SORT3: Logical field CLSDTE not found in physical record format VCAREC. <p>Note that field SORT1 is similar to field SORT3. But field SORT1 is ahead of the CONCATed field SORT2, and field SORT3 is after the CONCATed field SORT2. <p>Changing the position of field SORT3 so it's before SORT2 (which has the CONCAT keyword) results in a good compile of the LF. See figure 2. <p>In my testing of this, it seems if ANY field not containing the SST keyword is inserted after the field with the CONCAT keyword, then the LF compiles ok. <p>Has anyone else encountered this problem? <p><!--mccodelink_begin--> <BR>
<!-- do not remove --> <BR>
<hr width=50 align=left><small><a href='http://www.mcpressonline.com/mc/showcode@@.6b50a9a5' target='_blank'>Code</a></small> <BR>
<!--mccodelink_end-->