Good Versus Evil
** This thread discusses the article: Good Versus Evil **
The political party that is in power today in the USA understands this as history understands this (before history is rewritten). First off, I am not up in arms against my country now or even when the other politcal party was in power. With checks and balances it takes some mighty evil to turn this country into something that will turn the general populace into an armed revolution....which is what happened back in the 1770's, which is why your Queen doesn't have a residence in Wash DC. But, the idea is: when it gets so oppressive....no that's not the idea, the idea is it will never get oppressive like it was in the former USSR (an unarmed populace) with an armed populace like we have had since this country was founded on an armed populace who overthrew tyrants. It is the government who has to keep a certain amount of paranoia about the population. It is the way its designed. Its in the history books, England didn't give us our freedom, and an unarmed population won't keep it. Protection against just plain local criminals is just a side benefit.
** This thread discusses the article: Good Versus Evil **
The political party that is in power today in the USA understands this as history understands this (before history is rewritten). First off, I am not up in arms against my country now or even when the other politcal party was in power. With checks and balances it takes some mighty evil to turn this country into something that will turn the general populace into an armed revolution....which is what happened back in the 1770's, which is why your Queen doesn't have a residence in Wash DC. But, the idea is: when it gets so oppressive....no that's not the idea, the idea is it will never get oppressive like it was in the former USSR (an unarmed populace) with an armed populace like we have had since this country was founded on an armed populace who overthrew tyrants. It is the government who has to keep a certain amount of paranoia about the population. It is the way its designed. Its in the history books, England didn't give us our freedom, and an unarmed population won't keep it. Protection against just plain local criminals is just a side benefit.
Comment