Tweet
Probably SI09364 or one of its many superseding PTFs.
-
-
5.2 and cum pack 3364
That PTF has beed superceded by SI10368 - and we have that loaded. -
5.2 and cum pack 3364
We have just loaded the latest cum pack and we seem to have a problem with CPYTOIMPF. Nothing has changed in any CL/RPG/ or file layout BUT after populating files with CPYTOIMPF it seems to have reduced the field lengths of some records. If we change the RPG to allow for this - then all OK. anyone heard of this one? PS it seems to happen when pulling fields after packed fields TIA CarlComment
-
5.2 and cum pack 3364
That would be it, then.Comment
Comment