Sweet irony
Chris: you stated "If we had wanted to deal with Iraq, that was the time to do it. I understand that there were reasons why we didn't but none of that justifies our current invasion of Iraq." Did you know that General Patton wanted to continue his invasion of europe and "take care" of the soviets BUT the DEMOCRATIC leadership WOULD NOT LET HIM?!?!?! All I can say is that we "followed the UNITED NATIONS criteria in 1990." That criteria told us (The USA) to only remove the invaders from Kuwait. Since the UN has been proven to be a WORTHLESS organization whose ONLY PURPOSE is to waste perfectly good real estate in NYC, we (The USA) did what needed to be done. PERIOD. If General Patton had been allowed to conquer the USSR, I firmly believe we would never have had the "cold war" nor would we be subjected to the useless and worthless will of the "UN". So, Presindent Bush did what Roosevelt would not allow Patton to do. HE HAD THE MILITARY TAKE CARE OF THE PROBLEM. That in itself "justifies our current invasion of Iraq" your words not mine. I have been to NYC, I have seen Ground Sero. I have talked with several NYPD and FDNY personnel who lost family on 9/11. I have heard the pain in their voices, seen the grieve in their eyes, felt the pain that they bear every day. Hussein, I am sure, contributed to the terriorists. Not directly, but though some manner. the invasion WAS JUSTIFIED. PERIOD. The ultimate justification was proven Saturday. History will show that. Just like history showed that we had to nuke IMPERIAL Japan. Otherwise SEVERAL THOUSAND US personel would have perished. Imagine if we had taken care of Hussein, went to Afghanistan and continue to look for Ben Laden. Who knows, your name perhaps would be on a memorial somewhere. Believe what you want, I do. The world is better today. It will be better once we remove the UN.
Chris: you stated "If we had wanted to deal with Iraq, that was the time to do it. I understand that there were reasons why we didn't but none of that justifies our current invasion of Iraq." Did you know that General Patton wanted to continue his invasion of europe and "take care" of the soviets BUT the DEMOCRATIC leadership WOULD NOT LET HIM?!?!?! All I can say is that we "followed the UNITED NATIONS criteria in 1990." That criteria told us (The USA) to only remove the invaders from Kuwait. Since the UN has been proven to be a WORTHLESS organization whose ONLY PURPOSE is to waste perfectly good real estate in NYC, we (The USA) did what needed to be done. PERIOD. If General Patton had been allowed to conquer the USSR, I firmly believe we would never have had the "cold war" nor would we be subjected to the useless and worthless will of the "UN". So, Presindent Bush did what Roosevelt would not allow Patton to do. HE HAD THE MILITARY TAKE CARE OF THE PROBLEM. That in itself "justifies our current invasion of Iraq" your words not mine. I have been to NYC, I have seen Ground Sero. I have talked with several NYPD and FDNY personnel who lost family on 9/11. I have heard the pain in their voices, seen the grieve in their eyes, felt the pain that they bear every day. Hussein, I am sure, contributed to the terriorists. Not directly, but though some manner. the invasion WAS JUSTIFIED. PERIOD. The ultimate justification was proven Saturday. History will show that. Just like history showed that we had to nuke IMPERIAL Japan. Otherwise SEVERAL THOUSAND US personel would have perished. Imagine if we had taken care of Hussein, went to Afghanistan and continue to look for Ben Laden. Who knows, your name perhaps would be on a memorial somewhere. Believe what you want, I do. The world is better today. It will be better once we remove the UN.
Comment